|
The Washington
Times
Sex-ed battles raging in region
By Jon Ward
Published February 10, 2005
Montgomery and Fairfax counties' sometimes angry debates about homosexuality
in public school curriculums are generating national attention and attracting
advocates from both sides of the issue.
"You've got two very influential counties that are affluent and
large and seen as education leaders grappling with this issue. It's
going to reverberate across the country," said Robert Knight, director
of the Culture and Family Institute, an affiliate of the national conservative
women's group Concerned Women for America.
The group Advocates for Youth (AFY), which promotes programs that help
young people nationwide make decisions about their sexual health, says
it sees an opportunity in Montgomery County to help end discrimination
against homosexual students.
"The great majority of parents want their children to receive accurate
and complete sex education," said Barbara Huberman, AFY director
of education and outreach. "My hope would be that a success example
like Montgomery County would give confidence and support to other communities
that this is the right thing to do for their children."
Montgomery County's school board has approved a sex-education curriculum
in which students are told that homosexuality is not a choice and that
same-sex couples are one form of a family. The new curriculum will be
tested in six schools this spring.
The curriculum has angered some parents and local activists -- mostly
from the northern and more conservative sections of the county, such
as Gaithersburg and Damascus. They have challenged and rallied against
the curriculum for several weeks, saying it goes beyond an explanation
of homosexuality, advocating the lifestyle.
Michelle Turner, a leader of the local group Citizens for Responsible
Curriculum, said CRC does not have an "opposition to [homosexuality]
being taught at all."
"It's just that it's only being taught from one viewpoint. Why
won't the schools invite ex-gays to come and speak? Why won't they include
data about the overall health of gay men?" she said.
Warren Throckmorton specializes in the study of homosexuality as a psychology
professor at Grove City College, a Christian school in Pennsylvania.
He said he has received about two calls each week for several months
from school officials and parents "concerned about how to teach
the matter of homosexuality, without being an advocate for a particular
perspective."
"A lot of people who are not politically in this fight are trying
to avoid being taken advantage of by what they consider to be a gay
political-activist agenda," Mr. Throckmorton said. "At the
same time, they don't want to put their heads in the sand and say, 'We
don't want our kids to know nothing.' They want a balanced view, and
that's where a lot of people I talk to are struggling, about where they
can get that balanced view."
Mr. Throckmorton wrote a 33-page critique of what he calls the "bias"
of Montgomery County's proposed curriculum.
David Fishback, chairman of the citizens advisory committee in Montgomery
County that crafted the new curriculum, said Mr. Throckmorton thinks
homosexuals are "sick and or ... sinful."
"That theology should not be dressed up as something other than
what it is," he said, adding that information about the rise of
HIV and AIDS among homosexuals is used "to demonize people who
are gay."
Mr. Fishback's panel drew additional scrutiny yesterday when the Associated
Press reported that one of the four student members on the 27-member
committee is an 11-year-old girl from Takoma Park Middle School who
the school board appointed to the panel in June.
The school board has received hundreds of e-mails from Rockville, Bethesda
and Takoma Park in support of the curriculum , and the group Teach the
Facts has grown out of that support.
Meanwhile, Fairfax County School Board member Stephen M. Hunt last month
piqued the ire of fellow board members and of homosexual groups when
he sent a letter to principals asking them to invite "ex-gay"
speakers into their schools, and not just homosexuals, as is the current
practice.
He said his Jan. 30 letter was prompted in part by the debate in Montgomery
County and remarks he read in student newspapers "that really portrayed
the attitude that you could condone homosexual activity, or [else] you
were a hate-mongering bigot, with no middle ground."
"The kids are only getting one side of the issue," Mr. Hunt
said. "The reason they're getting this attitude is that they're
not hearing from people who have a different attitude."
After being reprimanded by his fellow board members, Mr. Hunt wrote
a letter of apology, saying his recommendation of using a video featuring
former homosexuals strayed into the area of directing school curriculum,
he said.
Cheryl Wetzstein contributed to this report.
Copyright ©
2005 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
|